Pharmacy Act 1948
On this page
Direct answer
Who may call himself a pharmacist in India, and on what qualification — the Pharmacy Act, 1948 settles both questions by creating the Pharmacy Council of India (PCI), empowering it to frame the Education Regulations that set minimum entry standards, and vesting the actual register of pharmacists in State Pharmacy Councils. Registration, not a degree alone, confers the legal right to practise pharmacy and to use the title "pharmacist"; misconduct can strike a name off the register under section 32; and falsely claiming to be a registered pharmacist is punishable, textbooks commonly citing section 42 with imprisonment up to six months or fine up to five hundred rupees. The Act regulates the profession; the Drugs and Cosmetics Act regulates the products.
What you must remember
- PCI is a statutory body under section 3: a chairman appointed by the central government, members elected from among State Pharmacy Council members, central government nominees (the majority of whom must hold pharmacy or pharmaceutical chemistry qualifications), and representatives of bodies such as the UGC and AICTE.
- PCI functions: framing the Education Regulations, approving or withdrawing approval of courses and examining bodies, and maintaining the Central Register of pharmacists.
- Education Regulations (ER-2020 govern the current D.Pharm): two-year diploma after 10+2 with science, followed by 500 hours of practical training spread over about three months, with uniform standards across India.
- State Pharmacy Councils maintain the register for their state — registration is the licence to practise and to use the title "pharmacist".
- Section 19 deals with minimum qualification for entry on the register; the first register (sections 30-31 territory) absorbed persons already practising on prescribed qualifications at the Act's commencement.
- Section 32: removal from the register for professional misconduct, following inquiry, with provision for restoration of names.
- Section 42-type offence: falsely representing oneself as a registered pharmacist — punishment commonly quoted as imprisonment up to six months or fine up to Rs 500 or both.
- "Approved qualification" and "approved examination" are the Act's terms for what PCI recognises; without approval, a course does not open the register.
- ER uniformity is deliberate: a pharmacist registered in one state is recognisable across India through the Central Register.
From 10+2 to the register, walked through
Trace a student's path and the Act's machinery arranges itself in order. She completes higher secondary with physics, chemistry and mathematics or biology, then a two-year D.Pharm in a PCI-approved institution under the current Education Regulations — approval is the PCI's leverage over quality, and withdrawal of approval is its sanction. She completes 500 hours of practical training in a recognised setting, roughly three months of full-time work. She then applies to the State Pharmacy Council of her state with proof of qualification, training and fee; her name enters the register and she receives a certificate of registration — from that moment she may legally practise pharmacy and sign dispensing records, including supervising a retail medical shop under the Drugs Rules.
Suppose, years later, she is found issuing Schedule H drugs without prescriptions repeatedly, or falsifying prescription records — a complaint to the State Council triggers an inquiry, and section 32 allows removal of her name for such professional misconduct, with a path to restoration on satisfactory cause. Should she move states, she registers afresh with the new State Council, while the Central Register maintained by the PCI keeps the national picture coherent. Every element of this narrative — ER, approval, register, misconduct, removal — is a numbered section or function the examination asks for by name.
The traps in this chapter
The first is PCI versus State Council: the PCI prescribes education and keeps the Central Register; the State Councils register pharmacists and discipline them. Students who write "PCI registers pharmacists" lose an easy mark. The second is Act-identity: the Pharmacy Act has nothing to do with drug quality — that is the 1940 Act — and everything to do with who may practise; questions are set precisely on this boundary.
The third trap is currency: quoting outdated training rules. The ER-2020 figure — 500 hours of practical training over about three months for the D.Pharm — is today's answer, replacing the older schemes; viva examiners specifically check whether candidates know the current regulation name. Fourth, the title point: "pharmacist" is a protected title usable only by registered persons, which is why D.Pharm students may not sign as pharmacists before registration even while working in shops — and why the person "present at the counter" in an inspected shop must be able to produce a registration certificate.
Frequently asked questions
What is the constitution of the Pharmacy Council of India?
A chairman appointed by the central government, members elected from among State Pharmacy Council members, central government nominees (most holding prescribed pharmacy qualifications), and representatives of bodies such as the UGC and AICTE — reconstituted periodically.
What are the Education Regulations and which one is current?
Regulations framed by the PCI prescribing minimum qualifications for pharmacy practice; the ER-2020 govern the current D.Pharm — two years after 10+2 science plus 500 hours of practical training over about three months, uniform across India.
Who maintains the register of pharmacists and why does it matter?
State Pharmacy Councils maintain their registers; entry on the register is the legal qualification to practise pharmacy and to use the title "pharmacist", and removal under section 32 ends that right.
On what grounds can a pharmacist's name be removed?
Professional misconduct established after inquiry by the State Council — falsified records, illegal sales, conviction involving moral turpitude — with statutory provision for restoration of the name later.
What is the penalty for falsely claiming to be a registered pharmacist?
Under the Act's penal provision (commonly cited as section 42), imprisonment up to six months or fine up to five hundred rupees or both for false representation of registration.