Facebow: Arbitrary versus Kinematic
On this page
Direct answer
A facebow transfers the relation of the maxillary arch to the transverse hinge axis of the temporomandibular joint onto the articulator, so the cast opens along the patient's own arc of rotation rather than the instrument's assumed one. Arbitrary facebows — facia, earpiece and quick-mount types such as the Slidematic — estimate this axis from external landmarks, classically a point about 13 mm anterior to the tragus on the tragus-to-canthus line; kinematic facebows find the true hinge axis by watching a stylus trace arcs as the mandible rotates, the axis lying where the stylus describes no arc at all. Arbitrary transfer suffices for routine crown and short bridge work, since a location within about 5 mm of the true axis is considered acceptable; kinematic transfer earns its trouble in full-mouth rehabilitation and whenever the occlusal vertical dimension will be changed substantially.
What you must remember
- What the facebow actually records: the maxilla's position relative to the hinge axis (plus, with an orbital pointer, a third reference forming the axis-orbital plane) — it records nothing about the mandible.
- Arbitrary axis landmark: classically described as roughly 13 mm anterior to the posterior border of the tragus along a line to the outer canthus; individual variation is why tolerance matters.
- Acceptable error: an arbitrary location within about 5 mm of the true hinge axis is commonly regarded as clinically acceptable for most work.
- Kinematic technique essentials: clutches on the teeth, a stylus attached to the mandibular member, mandibular rotation in open-close and lateral arcs; chalk arcs on the plate intersect at the terminal hinge axis.
- When errors matter: the farther a tooth is from the hinge axis (second and third molars) and the greater the planned change in vertical dimension, the more an axis error distorts the restored occlusion.
- Kinematic indications: full-mouth rehabilitation, large alterations of occlusal vertical dimension, implant-supported full-arch work and research recording.
- Orbital pointer purpose: it completes a third point of reference so the occlusal plane can be related to the Frankfort plane, kept roughly parallel to the floor.
Locating the true hinge axis on the bench
Narrate it as the examiner expects. Cement or clip a clutch to the mandibular teeth and attach a facebow-style flag with an adjustable stylus pointing at the skin over the presumed condylar hinge area. Have the patient relax supine and rotate the mandible purely in the retruded hinge position — small opening and closing arcs, no translation — while the stylus traces against the stationary flag. If the stylus is off the axis it sweeps an arc; move it toward that arc's centre and repeat until the point describes no movement in any arc. That point of no movement is the transverse hinge axis; mark both sides, transfer them to the articulator, and the mounted cast now rotates about the patient's own axis. The logic to state aloud: only pure rotation, never translation, may be used while locating, because translation drags the stylus in ways that fake axis position.
High-yield viva angles
The guaranteed question is the comparison, and the neat answer is a single sentence each: arbitrary facebows are fast, need no special skill and serve routine fixed work within a tolerated error; kinematic facebows are slow and technique-sensitive but accurate for extensive reconstruction. The classic trap is the statement "a facebow records the mandibular relation" — it does not; it orients the maxillary cast. A second favourite asks why an arbitrary facebow works at all, and the expected reasoning is geometric: arc discrepancies of a few millimetres near the axis produce negligible occlusal error for routine restorations, but the same error amplified by a raised vertical dimension or second-molar distance becomes real. Indian university practicals also test assembly: candidates are handed a Slidematic-type bow and asked to identify the fork, the condylar rods and the orbital pointer, and marks go for handling rather than theory alone.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between an arbitrary and a kinematic facebow?
An arbitrary facebow estimates the hinge axis from landmarks near the tragus, while a kinematic facebow locates the true hinge axis by stylus arc tracing during pure mandibular rotation.
Why is a tolerance of about 5 mm acceptable for arbitrary facebows?
Small discrepancies between the estimated and true axis produce negligible occlusal error for routine restorations; the error only becomes clinically meaningful in long reconstructions or large vertical dimension changes.
What is the role of the orbital pointer in a facebow transfer?
It provides a third anterior reference point, creating the axis-orbital plane that relates the occlusal plane to the Frankfort plane during mounting.
When is a kinematic facebow preferred over an arbitrary one?
Full-mouth rehabilitation, substantial alteration of the occlusal vertical dimension, full-arch implant prostheses and any situation where hinge-axis accuracy directly shapes the occlusion.
Does a facebow record the mandibular position?
No — it records the maxillary arch's relation to the hinge axis; mandibular position is transferred separately by an interocclusal record.