Wave Energy and Intensity

On this page
  1. Direct answer
  2. What you must remember
  3. Worked comparison: two sources
  4. Exam angles on intensity
  5. Frequently asked questions
  6. Related topics

Direct answer

A wave is a moving patch of stressed, moving medium: both potential and kinetic energy travel with it, and both scale as the square of amplitude, giving average string power P = ½μvω²A² and three-dimensional intensity I = ½ρvω²A² (μ mass per unit length, ρ density, v wave speed, ω angular frequency). Doubling amplitude quadruples the intensity; doubling frequency quadruples it too. From a point source the power spreads over spheres, so I = P/4πr² falls as 1/r² while the amplitude itself falls only as 1/r — a distinction JEE tests relentlessly. Sound levels compress this range logarithmically: β = 10 log10(I/I0) with the threshold of hearing I0 = 10⁻¹² W/m², so every ten-fold intensity rise adds 10 dB, every doubling adds 3 dB, and doubling distance from a point source subtracts 6 dB.

What you must remember

  • Squares law: intensity ∝ A² and ∝ ω² (i.e. f²); quadrupling amplitude raises intensity sixteen-fold — check exponents before anything else in the question.
  • String wave power: P = ½μvω²A², with v = √(T/μ) the wave speed; energy transport needs the medium to move, and the power flows at the wave speed.
  • Three-dimensional intensity: I = ½ρvω²A²; for a point source radiating power P, I = P/4πr² at distance r.
  • Inverse-square consequences: I ∝ 1/r² but A ∝ 1/r; doubling distance quarters intensity (−6 dB) and halves amplitude.
  • Decibel scale: β = 10 log10(I/I0), I0 = 10⁻¹² W/m²; ×10 intensity = +10 dB, ×2 = +3 dB; normal conversation near 60 dB (10⁻⁶ W/m²), pain threshold 120 dB (1 W/m²).
  • Standing waves carry no net energy: energy oscillates locally between antinodes instead of propagating — superposition redistributes energy, it never destroys it.
  • Beat and interference link: at destructive interference the missing energy has relocated to constructive regions; total energy remains conserved across the pattern.

Worked comparison: two sources

A small source radiates 0.5 W of sound. At 10 m, I = P/4πr² = 0.5/1257 ≈ 4 × 10⁻⁴ W/m², a level of 10 log10(4 × 10⁸) ≈ 86 dB. Walk to 20 m and intensity falls to 10⁻⁴ W/m² — 80 dB: doubling distance removed 6 dB exactly as the inverse-square law demands. Now keep the position fixed and double the source's amplitude instead: intensity quadruples to 1.6 × 10⁻³ W/m², a jump of +6 dB from the original — amplitude doubling and distance doubling produce equal-magnitude, opposite-sign level changes, a symmetry worth internalising because options are set to catch it.

Second comparison, on a string: two waves of the same frequency, amplitudes A and 3A, travel on the same wire. Their power ratio is 1:9 (amplitude squared), so if the smaller wave carries 2 W, the larger carries 18 W. Now let them interfere: at a constructive point the resultant amplitude is 4A, and the local intensity is sixteen times that of the first wave alone — yet summed over the whole pattern the total power is just 20 W. The arithmetic makes the conservation point unmissable: interference piles energy into antinodes by draining the nodes, and any question implying energy destruction at destructive interference has a wrong premise built in.

Exam angles on intensity

The classic slip is assigning amplitude a 1/r² fall; that belongs to intensity, amplitude falls as 1/r for spherical waves. Second, decibel arithmetic inverts under subtraction: going from 80 dB to 60 dB is a hundred-fold intensity drop, not a quarter, and linear instincts about "dB difference" misfire. Third, frequency dependence is forgotten: at the same amplitude, a 2 kHz wave carries four times the intensity of a 1 kHz wave, a fact questions exploit through "identical amplitude" phrasing. Fourth, the string formula's v is the wave speed √(T/μ), not the particle speed ωA — a dimensional slip that produces wildly wrong answers and a favourite of diagnostic multiple-correct items. Main tests plug-in intensity and dB numbers; Advanced prefers reasoning — sketch the 1/r versus 1/r² behaviour, compare two interfering sources' power budgets, or connect wave energy to why the second harmonic contributes disproportionately to a plucked guitar string's brightness.

Frequently asked questions

How does the energy carried by a wave depend on amplitude and frequency?

Intensity scales with the square of both: I ∝ A²ω², so doubling either amplitude or frequency quadruples the intensity.

Why does amplitude fall as 1/r but intensity as 1/r² from a point source?

Power spreads over a sphere of area 4πr², so intensity must fall as 1/r²; since intensity goes as amplitude squared, amplitude itself falls only as 1/r.

What intensity corresponds to the threshold of hearing and of pain?

10⁻¹² W/m² defines 0 dB at the hearing threshold, and 1 W/m² corresponds to 120 dB, the pain threshold — a factor of 10¹² spanned by the decibel scale.

How many decibels does doubling the intensity add?

3 dB, since 10 log10(2) ≈ 3; a ten-fold intensity increase adds exactly 10 dB.

Do standing waves transport energy?

No — in a standing wave energy shuttles between adjacent antinodes locally rather than propagating, which is why the net power flow past any point averages to zero.

Same topic for other exams

Practise this in the PrepElephant app

Question banks, previous-year questions, mock tests and revision tools — for Wave Energy and Intensity and JEE Physics. Free to start.

Get the free app WhatsApp