Transformer

On this page
  1. Direct answer
  2. What you must remember
  3. A doorbell transformer, accounted to the last decimal
  4. Where the turns hide the traps
  5. Frequently asked questions
  6. Related topics

Direct answer

Mains electricity reaches an Indian home at 220 V, yet a doorbell needs a few volts and a transmission line wants several lakh — the transformer performs both conversions with no moving parts. An alternating current in the primary sets up changing flux in a laminated soft-iron core, inducing an emf in the secondary by mutual induction: E_s/E_p = N_s/N_p, with an ideal machine conserving power so I_s/I_p = N_p/N_s. Step-up raises voltage and lowers current; step-down does the reverse; and DC gives a steady flux and no emf — the machines are AC-only, which is why long-distance transmission steps the voltage up: halving the current quarters the line's I^2R loss.

What you must remember

  • Turns ratio: E_s/E_p = N_s/N_p; the voltage ratio equals the turns ratio, and for an ideal transformer I_p V_p = I_s V_s so currents go the opposite way.
  • Step-up versus step-down: N_s > N_p raises voltage and lowers current; N_s < N_p does the reverse — a transformer changes voltage and current, never frequency and never DC power.
  • Why AC only: a steady DC flux does not change, so dΦ/dt = 0 and no emf appears in the secondary; feeding DC can also burn the primary, whose opposition to current is then only its small resistance.
  • Four losses: copper loss I^2R in the windings (reduced by thick conductors), eddy-current heating (reduced by laminations), hysteresis loss per cycle (reduced by soft silicon steel with a narrow loop), and flux leakage (reduced by a closed core winding both coils on a common limb).
  • Efficiency: real power transformers commonly run above 95 per cent, large units near 99.
  • Transmission logic: line loss = I^2R_line; stepping voltage up by a factor of n cuts current n-fold and loss n^2-fold — the entire case for high-voltage transmission.

A doorbell transformer, accounted to the last decimal

A doorbell transformer has N_p = 2200 turns on the primary connected to the 220 V mains, and N_s = 100 turns on the secondary. The secondary voltage follows the ratio: E_s = 220 × (100/2200) = 10 V. The bell draws 2 A at 10 V — 20 W — and an ideal transformer would draw exactly 20 W from the mains, I_p = 20/220 ≈ 0.09 A. Now run the machine backwards: connect 10 V AC to the 100-turn side and the 2200-turn side delivers 220 V — the same device is a step-up transformer now, because "primary" only names the coil you feed. And run the loss bookkeeping: if this real unit is 90 per cent efficient, the primary draws 22.2 W, the extra 2.2 W shared among copper heating, eddies in the laminations and hysteresis in the iron every cycle. Each loss has a named cure, and matching loss to cure is half the marks in this chapter.

Where the turns hide the traps

The most frequent error is treating the transformer as a power source: when the secondary voltage rises, the secondary current falls, and options that show both increasing violate conservation — the examiner includes them to catch formula-without-physics. The second trap is the DC question: a transformer supplied with DC delivers nothing (after a transient), and the primary may burn because only the winding's small resistance limits the current with no reactive opposition — the justification expected in assertion-reason form. Third, frequency is invariant: a 50 Hz input gives a 50 Hz output, whatever the turns ratio, since the secondary emf follows the same changing flux. Fourth, loading: an unloaded transformer draws only a small magnetising current, and the primary current grows only as the secondary delivers power. Finally, efficiency direction: efficiency = output power/input power, and the losses scale differently — copper loss with load current squared, hysteresis and eddy losses with frequency regardless of load — so "which loss remains even on no load" has a definite answer.

Frequently asked questions

On what principle does a transformer work?

Mutual induction: an alternating primary current produces a changing core flux that links the secondary and induces an emf proportional to its number of turns.

Why cannot a transformer work on direct current?

A steady DC produces a constant flux and no induced emf; worse, the primary may overheat for lack of inductive opposition.

How does stepping up voltage reduce transmission losses?

Power at higher voltage needs lower current, and the line's heat loss I^2R falls as the square of that current reduction — the reason grids run at very high voltages.

Which losses occur in a real transformer?

Copper (I^2R) losses in the windings, eddy-current heating in the core, hysteresis loss in the iron each cycle, and flux leakage that fails to link both coils.

Can the same transformer be used as step-up and step-down?

Yes — the coil you feed is the primary; reversing the roles inverts the turns ratio, so a 220 V-to-10 V unit used backwards steps 10 V up to 220 V.

Practise this in the PrepElephant app

Question banks, previous-year questions, mock tests and revision tools — for Transformer and NEET-UG Physics. Free to start.

Get the free app WhatsApp